Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Hassall's avatar

Worrying for the players given the track record of players vs. teams in legal battles in Dota. Last of Gaimin's good will eviscerated, and a messy end to one of the best Dota 2 teams of the last 3 years.

Tudor Cristian Bogdan's avatar

I hope during the case they will investigate

1. What were the sponsorship expectations and were they explicitly mentioning the members or were the sponsorship expectations directed at the org? Was the org or the members expected to perform duties?

2. What did the org do to remind and support the members to perform the sponsorships?

3. How much $ were the sponsorships that the members did not meet requirements for?

4. Were the asks from the org to the members equal in value as the $ that the org can prove the members did not honor?

5. Did the sponsor directly mention Quinn's comments as the reason for not renewing?

6. Why did the org continue to support Quinn after the comments?

7. Did the org support the team with what they needed in order to fulfill their socia media obligations? (e.g. did they have the scripts, the equipment and the editors / producers ready to roll with the obligations and the members flat out refused?)

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?